allman brother dies

Now on Sale! 2018-2019 Exotic cruises
Princess Cruises <info@em.princess.com>

Today, 1:01 PMYou


Ohio State

The Ohio State University, commonly referred to as Ohio State or OSU, is a large, primarily residential,[4] public university in Columbus, Ohio. Founded in 1870 as a land-grant university and ninth university in Ohio with the Morrill Act of 1862,[5] the university was originally known as the Ohio Agricultural and Mechanical College (Mech). The college began with a focus on training students in various agricultural and mechanical disciplines but was developed into a comprehensive university under the direction of then Governor (later, President) Rutherford B. Hayes, and in 1878 the Ohio General Assembly passed a law changing the name to “The Ohio State University”.[6] It has since grown into the third-largest university campus in the United States.[7] Along with its main campus in Columbus, Ohio State also operates a regional campus system with regional campuses in Lima, Mansfield, Marion, Newark, and Wooster.

The university has an extensive student life program, with over 1,000 student organizations; intercollegiate, club and recreational sports programs; student media organizations and publications, fraternities and sororities; and three student governments. Ohio State athletic teams compete in Division I (Football Bowl Subdivision for football) of the NCAA and are known as the Ohio State Buckeyes. Athletes from Ohio State have won 100 Olympic medals (44 gold, 35 silver, and 21 bronze). The university is a member of the Big Ten Conference for the majority of sports. The Ohio State men’s ice hockey program competes in the Big Ten Conference, while its women’s hockey program competes in the Western Collegiate Hockey Association. In addition, the OSU men’s volleyball team is a member of the Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association (MIVA). OSU is one of only 14 universities that plays Division I FBS football and Division I ice hockey.

As of August 2015, the university had awarded a total of 714,512 degrees. Alumni and former students have gone on to prominent careers in government, business, science, medicine, education, sports, and entertainment.

Contents

lets dance

Early life and education

Her father, Bill Miller, was the owner of a night club in New Jersey and later in Las Vegas.[3]

Miller attended Ohio State University, where she was a member of Kappa Alpha Theta sorority.[9][citation needed] She graduated from Barnard College in 1969 and received a master’s degree in public affairs from Princeton University‘s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs. In 1993, she married Jason Epstein, an editor and publisher.

New York Times career

During Miller’s tenure at The New York Times, she was a member of the team that won the Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting, for its 2001 coverage of global terrorism before and after the September 11 attacks. She and James Risen received the award and one of the cited articles appeared under her byline.[10]

Her writing during this period has been criticised by Middle-east scholar Edward Said for the anti-Islamic bias in her writing. In his book Covering Islam Said stated that Miller’s book God Has Ninety-Nine Names “is like a textbook of the inadequacies and distortions of media coverage of Islam.” He criticised her poor grasp of Arabic, saying that “nearly every time she tries to impress us with her ability to say a phrase or two in Arabic she unerringly gets it wrong… They are the crude mistakes committed by a foreigner who neither has care nor… respect for her subject.” He concludes, “she fears and dislikes Lebanon, hates Syria, laughs at Libya, dismisses Sudan, feels sorry for and a little alarmed by Egypt and is repulsed by Saudi Arabia. She hasn’t bothered to learn the language and is relentlessly only concerned with the dangers of Islamic militancy, which, I would hazard a guess, accounts for less than 5 percent of the billion-strong Islamic world.”[1]

Anthrax hoax victim

On October 12, 2001, Miller opened an anthrax hoax letter mailed to her New York Times office. The 2001 anthrax attacks had begun occurring in the wake of the September 11 attacks in 2001, with anthrax-laced letters sent to ABC News, CBS News, NBC News, and the New York Post, all in New York City, as well as the National Enquirer in Boca Raton, Florida. Two additional letters (with a higher grade of anthrax) were sent on October 9, 2001, to Senators Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy in Washington. Twenty-two people were infected; five died. In 2008, the government’s investigation of these mailings focused on Bruce Ivins, who later committed suicide, with the investigation determining that Ivins acted alone.[11]

Miller was the only major U.S. media reporter, and the New York Times the only major U.S. media organization, to be victimized by a fake anthrax letter in the fall of 2001. Miller had reported extensively on the subject of biological threats and had co-authored, with Stephen Engelberg and William Broad, a book on bio-terrorism, Germs: Biological Weapons and America’s Secret War which was published on October 2, 2001. Miller co-authored an article on Pentagon plans to develop a more potent version of weaponized anthrax, “U.S. Germ Warfare Research Pushes Treaty Limits”, published in the New York Times on September 4, 2001, weeks before the first anthrax mailings.[12] Miller also participated in a senior-level bio-terror attack simulation on Oklahoma City conducted on June 22 and June 23, 2001, called “Operation Dark Winter“; her role was media reporter/observer.[13]

Islamic charities search leak

Shortly after the September 11 attacks, the U.S. government was considering adding the Holy Land Foundation to a list of organizations with suspected links to terrorism and was planning to search the premises of the organization. The information about the impending raid was given to Miller by a confidential source. On December 3, 2001, Miller telephoned the Holy Land Foundation for comment, and the New York Times published an article in the late edition papers and on its website that day. The next day, the government searched HLF’s offices. These occurrences led to a lawsuit brought by US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales,[14] with prosecutors claiming that Miller and her colleague Philip Shenon had queried this Islamic charity, and another, in ways that made them aware of the planned searches.[15]

The Iraq War

At The New York Times, Miller wrote on security issues, particularly about Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. Many of these stories later turned out to have been based upon faulty information.

On September 7, 2002, Miller and fellow Times reporter Michael R. Gordon reported the interception of “metal tubes” bound for Iraq. Her front-page story quoted unnamed “American officials” and “American intelligence experts” who said the tubes were intended to be used to enrich nuclear material, and cited unnamed “Bush administration officials” who claimed that, in recent months, Iraq had “stepped up its quest for nuclear weapons and [had] embarked on a worldwide hunt for materials to make an atomic bomb“.[16] Miller added that

Mr. Hussein’s dogged insistence on pursuing his nuclear ambitions, along with what defectors described in interviews as Iraq’s push to improve and expand Baghdad’s chemical and biological arsenals, have brought Iraq and the United States to the brink of war.[16]

Shortly after Miller’s article was published, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and Donald Rumsfeld appeared on television and pointed to Miller’s story in support of their position.[17] As summarized by the New York Review of Books, “in the following months, the tubes would become a key prop in the administration’s case for war, and the Times played a critical part in legitimizing it.”[17] Miller later said of the controversy

[M]y job isn’t to assess the government’s information and be an independent intelligence analyst myself. My job is to tell readers of The New York Times what the government thought about Iraq’s arsenal.[17]

In an April 2003 article, Miller, ostensibly on the basis of statements from the military unit in which she was embedded, reported claims allegedly made by an Iraqi scientist that Iraq had kept biological and chemical weapons until “right before the invasion.”[18] This report was widely repeated in the press. Miller went on The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer and stated:

Well, I think they found something more than a smoking gun. What they’ve found is a silver bullet in the form of a person, an Iraqi individual, a scientist, as we’ve called him, who really worked on the programs, who knows them firsthand, and who has led MET Alpha people[19] to some pretty startling conclusions.[20]

On May 26, 2004, a week after the U.S. government apparently severed ties with Ahmed Chalabi, a Times editorial acknowledged that some of the paper’s coverage in the run-up to the war had relied too heavily on Chalabi and other Iraqi exiles, who were bent on regime change. The editorial also expressed “regret” that “information that was controversial [was] allowed to stand unchallenged.” However, the editorial explicitly rejected “blame on individual reporters.”[21]

On May 27, 2004, the day after the Times’ mea culpa, James C. Moore quoted Miller in an article in Salon:

“You know what … I was proved fucking right. That’s what happened. People who disagreed with me were saying, ‘There she goes again.’ But I was proved fucking right.”[22]

The statement about being “proved…right” was in relation to another Miller story, wherein she’d claimed that trailers found in Iraq had been shown to be mobile weapons labs. However, that claim too was subsequently refuted as false.[23]

It was alleged later in Editor and Publisher that, while Miller’s reporting “frequently [did] not meet published Times standards”, she was not sanctioned and was given a relatively free rein, because she consistently delivered frequent front-page scoops for the paper by “cultivating top-ranking sources.”[24]

In October 2005, The New York Times Public Editor Byron Calame wrote:

Ms. Miller may still be best known for her role in a series of Times articles in 2002 and 2003 that strongly suggested Saddam Hussein already had or was acquiring an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction … Many of those articles turned out to be inaccurate … [T]he problems facing her inside and outside the newsroom will make it difficult for her to return to the paper as a reporter.[25]

Two weeks later, Miller negotiated a private severance package with Times’ publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger Jr. She contested Calame’s claims about her reporting and gave no ground in defending her work. She cited “difficulty” in performing her job effectively after having become “an integral part of the stories [she] was sent to cover.”[26]

Refusal to disclose source

In July 2005, several months prior to her October 2005 resignation from the New York Times, Miller was jailed for contempt of court for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury investigating a leak naming Valerie Plame as a CIA officer. While Miller never wrote about Plame, she was believed to be in possession of evidence relevant to the leak investigation. According to a subpoena, Miller met with an unnamed government official, later revealed to be I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Vice President Cheney‘s Chief of Staff, on July 8, 2003. Plame’s CIA identity was divulged publicly in a column by conservative political commentator Robert Novak on July 14, 2003. Novak’s source was revealed to have not been Libby, but Richard Armitage of the Department of State.

On July 16, 2005, The Washington Post reported that Miller could face criminal contempt charges, which could have extended her jail time six months beyond the four months then anticipated.[27] The Post also suggested that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald was particularly interested in hearing Miller’s version of her encounter with Libby. Filings by Fitzgerald reportedly alleged that Miller’s defiance of the court constituted a crime. On September 29, 2005, after spending 85 days in jail, Miller was released following a telephone call with Libby. He had reconfirmed the release of confidentiality. Under oath, Miller was questioned by Fitzgerald before a federal grand jury the following day, September 30, 2005,[28] but was not relieved of contempt charges until after testifying again on October 12, 2005.

For her second grand jury appearance, Miller produced a notebook from a previously undisclosed meeting with Libby on June 23, 2003. This was several weeks before Joseph Wilson’s New York Times editorial was published. This belied the theory that Libby was retaliating against Wilson for his Times editorial. According to Miller’s notes from that earlier meeting, Libby disclosed that Joseph Wilson’s wife was a CIA employee involved in her husband’s trip to Niger. Miller’s notebook from her July 8, 2003, meeting with Libby contains the name “Valerie Flame [sic]”.[29] This reference occurred six days before Novak published Plame’s name and unmasked her as a CIA operative.

Miller’s grand jury account was the basis for her last article in the Times. Miller testified as a witness on January 30, 2007, at the trial of Scooter Libby, which began in January 2007. The trial ended on March 6, 2007, with Libby’s conviction on four of five counts, though none of the counts had to do with actually revealing Plame’s name to the media.[30] The New York Times published Miller’s first-person account, “My Four Hours Testifying in the Federal Grand Jury Room”, on October 16, 2005. Miller claimed she could not remember who gave her the name “Valerie Plame” but that she was sure it didn’t come from Libby.[31] Armitage, who actually was the source for the leak, was never charged.

Contempt of court

On October 1, 2004, federal Judge Thomas F. Hogan found Miller in contempt of court for refusing to appear before a federal grand jury, which was investigating who had leaked to reporters the fact that Valerie Plame was a CIA operative. Miller did not write an article about the subject at the time of the leak, but others did, notably Robert Novak, spurring the investigation. Judge Hogan sentenced her to 18 months in jail, but stayed the sentence while her appeal proceeded. On February 15, 2005, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld Judge Hogan’s ruling. On June 17, 2005, the US Supreme Court declined to hear the case. On July 6, 2005, Judge Hogan ordered Miller to serve her sentence at “a suitable jail within the metropolitan area of the District of Columbia”. She was taken to Alexandria City Jail on July 7, 2005.[32][33]

In a separate case, Federal Judge Robert W. Sweet ruled on February 24, 2005, that Miller was not required to reveal who in the government leaked word of an impending raid to her. Patrick Fitzgerald, the same prosecutor who had had Miller jailed in the Plame case, argued that Miller’s calls to groups suspected of funding terrorists had tipped them off to the raid and allowed them time to destroy evidence. Fitzgerald wanted Miller’s phone records to confirm the time of the tip and determine who had leaked the information to Miller in the first place. Judge Sweet held that because Fitzgerald could not demonstrate in advance that the phone records would provide the information he sought the prosecutor’s needs were outweighed by a ‘reporter’s privilege’ to keep sources confidential. On August 1, 2006, a three-judge panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals reversed Judge Sweet’s decision, holding 2–1 that federal prosecutors could inspect the telephone records of Miller and Philip Shenon. Judge Ralph K. Winter, Jr. wrote: “No grand jury can make an informed decision to pursue the investigation further, much less to indict or not indict, without the reporters’ evidence”.[34]

Prior to her jailing for civil contempt, Miller’s lawyers argued that it was pointless to imprison her because she would never talk or reveal confidential sources. Under such circumstances, argued her lawyers, jail term would be “merely punitive” and would serve no purpose. Arguing that Miller should be confined to her home and could forego Internet access and cellphone use, Miller’s lawyers suggested that “impairing her unrestricted ability to do her job as an investigative journalist … would present the strictest form of coercion to her”.[35] Failing that, Miller’s lawyers asked that she be sent to a women’s facility in Danbury, Connecticut, nearer to “Ms. Miller’s 76-year-old husband”, retired book publisher Jason Epstein, who lives in New York City, and whose state of health was the subject of a confidential medical report filed by Miller’s attorneys. Upon being jailed, the Times reported on July 7, 2005, that Miller had purchased a cockapoo puppy to keep her husband company during her absence.[36]

On September 17, 2005, the Washington Post reported that Miller had received a “parade of prominent government and media officials” during her first 11 weeks in prison, including visits by former U.S. Republican Senator Bob Dole, NBC News anchor Tom Brokaw, and John R. Bolton, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.[37] After her release on September 29, 2005, Miller agreed to disclose to the grand jury the identity of her source, Lewis Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney’s chief of staff.[citation needed]

On Tuesday, January 30, 2007, Miller took the stand as a witness for the prosecution against I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby, Jr., Vice President Dick Cheney‘s former chief of staff. Miller discussed three conversations she had had with Libby in June and July 2003, including the meeting on June 23, 2003. In her first appearance before the grand jury, Miller said she could not remember. According to the New York Times, when asked if Libby discussed Valerie Plame, Miller responded in the affirmative, “adding that Libby had said Wilson worked at the agency’s (C.I.A.) division that dealt with limiting the proliferation of unconventional weapons”. The trial resulted in guilty verdicts against Libby.[38]

Independent journalist and author

Since leaving the New York Times, Miller has continued her work as a writer in Manhattan and has contributed several op-ed pieces to The Wall Street Journal. On May 16, 2006 she summarized her investigations on U.S. foreign policy regarding Libya’s dismantling of its weapons programs in an essay spanning two days.[39]

On May 17, 2006, NavySEALs.com and MediaChannel.org published an exclusive interview with Miller in which she detailed how the attack on the Cole led her to investigate Al Qaeda and, in July 2001, to her receiving information from a top-level White House source concerning top-secret NSA signals intelligence (SIGINT) about an impending Al Quaeda attack, possibly against the continental United States. Two months later, on September 11, Miller and her editor at the Times, Stephen Engelberg, both regretted not writing that story.[40]

On September 7, 2007, she was hired as an adjunct fellow of the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, a neo-conservative free-market think tank. Her duties included being a contributing editor for the organization’s publication, City Journal. On October 20, 2008, Fox News announced that it had hired Miller.[41]

As of 2016, she is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.[42]

The Iraq War revisited

On April 3, 2015, The Wall Street Journal published an op-ed piece by Miller[43] in which she defended her comportment during the lead-up to the war in Iraq, as well as the Bush administration’s stance and decisions regarding the war. “Officials [of the Bush administration] didn’t lie, and I wasn’t fed a line,” she wrote.[43] Miller acknowledged that “there was no shortage of mistakes about Iraq, and I made my share of them. The newsworthy claims of some of my prewar WMD stories were wrong”, but rejected the notion that “I took America to war in Iraq. It was all me”, which according to her “continue[d] to have believers”.[43]

Critics subsequently wrote that “Miller’s war reporting was disastrously wrong, and now she’s trying desperately to spin it all away,”.[44] Valerie Plame commented that while “no one is crediting [Miller] with starting the Iraq war,” and she was “not actually on the team that took us into the biggest, most tragic US foreign policy debacle ever … , [Miller’s] attempt to re-write history is both pathetic and self-serving.”[45]

The Guardian wrote that “in arguing that Bush was a victim of faulty intelligence analysis, Miller ignores extensive reporting showing that the Bush administration was making plans for an Iraq invasion before the advent of intelligence used to justify it.”[46]

Others[47] focused on what they termed as factual inaccuracies, such as Miller’s claim that “Hans Blix, the former chief of the international weapons inspectors, bears some responsibility [for the war]” because he “told the U.N. in January 2003 that despite America’s ultimatum, Saddam was still not complying fully with his U.N. pledges.”[43] Her critics pointed out that, although Blix indeed reported that “Iraq wasn’t fully compliant,”[48] he also reported that Iraq was “largely cooperative with regard to process,”[49] and, subsequently,[47] “made it abundantly clear, in an interview published in The New York Times, that nothing he’d seen at the time justified war,” an interview taken by Miller herself.[50]

Memoir

In April 2015, Miller published The Story: A Reporter’s Journey, a memoir that focused largely on her reporting during the second Gulf War. Her former colleague Neil Lewis characterized most of the reviews as “unreservedly critical.”[51] Writing in The New York Times, former Los Angeles Times reporter Terry McDermott wrote that although “this is not a score-settling book,” he found it “sad and flawed.”[52] Ιn The Washington Post, Erik Wemple wrote that the book’s “dynamic” of “Judy Miller against the world” lends her book an aspect that is “both depressing and desperate.”[53] A review in The Columbia Journalism Review called the book “less a memoir than an apologia and an assault.” [54] In The Daily Beast, Lloyd Grove characterized Miller’s work as “self-pitying.” [55] Criticizing Miller’s failure to fully take responsibility for the flaws in her reporting, Matt Taibbi wrote in Rolling Stone, “Most of The Story is a tale of dog after scheming dog eating Miller’s homework…. Mostly, she just had a lot of rotten luck. Or at least, that’s how it reads. It’s a sweeping, epic non-apology. Every bad thing Miller has ever been accused of turns out to be wrong or taken out of context, according to her.” [56]

Bibliography

See also

References

 

 

External links

Navigation menu

Bible Research

Skip to main content

About Us »Who We Are
What We Do
Core Principles
Research Staff
Contact ICR
Publications »Acts & Facts » Our monthly news magazine deals with science and the Bible
This Month’s Issue
Past Articles
Free Subscription
Days of Praise » Our daily devotional to strengthen and encourage the Christian witness
Today’s Devotional
Past Devotionals
Free Subscription
Creation Science Update » Timely news related to creation and evolution
This Week’s Articles
Past Articles
Free Mobile App
Technical Papers » In-depth peer-reviewed scientific articles
Past Articles
Latest Articles
Books » Books for developing a sound and fruitful Christian worldview
Guide to the Human Body
Guide to Series
Creation Basics & Beyond
Dinosaurs and the Bible
More Books…
DVDs and Videos » Get equipped with defensible answers to the most controversial questions of faith and science
Made in His Image
Unlocking the Mysteries of Genesis
Uncovering the Truth About Dinosaurs
ICR Webcast
That’s a Fact
More Videos…
Resources »Physical Sciences » Our universe and our planet were created for life
Astronomy
Math and Logic
Physics
Radiometric Dating
Earth Sciences » The global record shows recent creation and catastrophe
Age of the Earth
Climate Change
Dinosaurs
Fossil Record
Ice Age
Noah’s Ark and Flood
Oceans
Life Sciences » The miraculous complexity of life is rich in information and precise in structure
Botany
Genetics
Human Body
Microbiology
Origin of Life
Problems with Evolution
Zoology
Evidence for Creation » Discover the many lines of evidence that confirm biblical truth
Evidence for God
Evidence for Truth
Evidence from Nature
Evidence from Science
Evidence from Scripture
School of Biblical Apologetics » Training in biblical education and apologetics at the certificate, undergraduate, and graduate levels
Compare Programs
Apologetics Articles
Apologetics Q&A
Christian Education
Calendar
Teach All Things
ICR Store
Radio Programs
Events »Upcoming ICR Events
Our Speakers
How to Host an Event
Support ICR »Donate Now
Donate Monthly
Planned Giving
Public Financial Disclosures

Introduction
Genesis
Introduction to Genesis

In a very real sense, the book of Genesis is the most important book in the world, for it is the foundation upon which all the other sixty-five books of God’s written Word have been based. When Jesus Christ, after His resurrection, gave a key Bible study to His disciples on the way to Emmaus, He began with Genesis!

“Beginning at Moses and all the prophets, He expounded unto them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself” (Luke 24:27). We would do well to follow His example. If we want to understand the New Testament, we first need to understand Genesis; the New Testament contains at least two hundred direct quotations or clear allusions to events described in Genesis–more than from any other book in the Old Testament.

All the great doctrines of Christianity–sin, atonement, grace, redemption, faith, justification, salvation, and many others–are first encountered in Genesis. The greatest doctrine of all–the special creation of all things by the eternal, self-existent God–is revealed in the very first chapter of Genesis, the foundation of all foundations.

It is hardly surprising, therefore, that the greatest attacks on the Bible have been directed against the integrity and authority of Genesis. Since the only alternative to creation is evolution, these attacks are all ultimately based on evolutionism, the assumption that this complex universe can somehow be explained apart from the infinite creative power of God.

The creation account in Genesis is supported by numerous other references throughout the Bible, and this is true for all the later events recorded in Genesis as well. To some degree, archaeological discoveries, as well as other ancient writings and traditions, also support these events, but the only infallibly correct record of creation and primeval history is the book of Genesis. Its importance cannot be over-estimated.

Authorship

Until about 200 years ago, practically all authorities accepted the fact that Moses wrote Genesis and all the rest of the Pentateuch as well. The first writer to question this seems to have been a French infidel physician, Jean Astruc, about the time of the French revolution. Astruc argued that two writers wrote the two creation accounts in Genesis 1 and 2, on the basis of the different names for God used in the two chapters. Later writers during the 19th century, notably the German higher critic Julius Wellhausen, developed this idea into the elaborate documentary hypothesis of the origin of the Pentateuch.

According to this notion, the Pentateuch was written much later than the time of Moses, by at least four different writers or groups of writers, commonly identified now by J, E, D and P (standing for the Jehovist, Elohist, Deuteronomist and Priestly documents, respectively). Although some form of this theory is still being taught in most liberal seminaries and college departments of religion, it has been thoroughly discredited by conservative scholars. This is discussed further in the Introductions to Exodus and other books of the Pentateuch. In any case, there is no valid reason to question the Mosaic authorship of the Pentateuch, except for Genesis itself.

For Genesis, however, there is real substance to the documentary idea, though certainly not in the Astruc/Wellhausen form. In fact, it seems very likely that Moses was the compiler and editor of a number of earlier documents, written by Adam and other ancient patriarchs, rather than being the actual writer himself. After all, the events of Genesis took place long before Moses was born, whereas he was a direct participant in the events recorded in the other four books of the Pentateuch.

It is reasonable that Adam and his descendants all knew how to write and, therefore, kept records of their own times (note the mention of “the book of the generations of Adam” in Genesis 5:1). These records (probably kept on stone or clay tablets) were possibly handed down from father to son in the line of the God-fearing patriarchs until they finally were acquired by Moses when he led the children of Israel out of Egypt. During the wilderness wanderings, Moses compiled them into the book of Genesis, adding his own explanatory editorial comments where needed. Genesis is still properly considered as one of the books of Moses, since its present form is due to him, but it really records the eye-witness records of these primeval histories, as written originally by Adam, Noah, Shem, Isaac, Jacob and other ancient patriarchs.

The respective divisions of Genesis can be recognized by the recurring phrase: “These are the generations of…” The archaeologist P. J. Wiseman has shown that these statements probably represent the “signatures,” so to speak, of the respective writers as they concluded their accounts of the events during their lifetimes.

The Hebrew word for “generations” (toledoth) was translated in the Septuagint Greek by the Greek word genesis (used in the New Testament only in Matthew 1:1, there translated “generation”). Thus these divisional notations have indirectly provided the very name for the book of Genesis, which means “beginnings.”

It is interesting to note, as an indirect confirmation of this concept of Genesis authorship, that while Genesis is cited at least 200 times in the New Testament, Moses himself is never noted as the author of any of these citations. On the other hand, he is listed at least 40 times in reference to citations from the other four books of the Pentateuch. There are also frequent references to Moses in the later books of the Old Testament, but never in relation to the book of Genesis.

In sum, we can be absolutely confident that the events described in Genesis are not merely ancient legends or religious allegories, but the actual eyewitness accounts of the places, events and people of those early days of earth history, written by men who were there, then transmitted down to Moses, who finally compiled and edited them into a permanent record of those ancient times.

Click here for the list of Evidence for Creation Topics

« Previous                Home Page                 Next »

Quick Links
Home Subscriptions Radio Programs Search Tools Bible Site Map
Donate  Discovery CenterICR Store
Share Email Facebook Twitter Google+

Subscriptions
Contact ICR
Bible
Use Policy
Privacy Policy
Store

National Education Association

Skip to Content

‘I’ve Seen Firsthand All That Teachers Do’

Q&A with Todd Parr, award-winning children’s book author of ‘Teachers Rock!’

Get the Latest News »

Editors’ Picks

students in art class

Nation’s ‘Report Card’ Looks at Student Achievement in Visual Arts, Music

The National Assessment Governing Board recently released the first national assessment of students’ performance in visual arts and music in eight years. Eighth grade students’ abilities to create, perform, and respond to art, as well as their general knowledge of the arts were measured. Although the scores remain flat compared to 2008, the results also show that achievement gaps in arts may be narrowing.

TAKE ACTION

FOR THE CLASSROOM

Lily’s Blackboard

NEA Publications

NEA offers print and digital publications that inform and engage public school educators and allies of public education.

learn more

NEA Newsletters

Sign up for NEA Today Express, Works4Me, ESEA/NCLB update, and other NEA e-newsletters.

Sign-up Now